Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Annie Gaus results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 5,464 hits . Analysis detected 34,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,044 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,471 of 6,135 authors). This Annie Gaus is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Annie Gaus
Author details
Total words: 23,044
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles23K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.7% 23.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst