Exclusive | SF jail watchdog shared antisemitic conspiracy theories from extremist group on social media 94%

By Annie Gaus0% Titus Wu85%

5/9/2026, 12:27:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 53.8% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 2,701 faulty-reasoning hits from 968 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 89.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,295 of 20,145 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the article peer group.

A San Francisco official celebrated for his jail reform activism is under fire for allegedly abusive relationships with women  and freely ranted about Jews on social media while serving on multiple City Hall boards, The California Post can exclusively reveal. 
William Monroe Palmer  who refers to himself as an “alpha man”  and is the president of the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department Oversight Board, shared a plethora of disturbing Facebook and Instagram posts promoting antisemitic conspiracy theories, fringe books about Jewish world control along with diatribes about women, Christians, and the benefits of polygamy. 
In one April 21 Facebook, Palmer shared a video from a self-described “prophet” ZuhCar El Le Azar, who slams Christians for not doing “the research” about Jews. 
Azar cites an obscure racist tome called Chosen People From the Caucasus  which blames Jews for the transatlantic slave trade and argues that Jewish success is due to “lingering Neanderthal aggression”  and flashes an AI-generated Jewish caricature. 
“Is it because you were raised like that? 
After Trump and the Epstein files, genocide in Israel and the historical racist abuse you are still voting as Demoncrats and Rethuglicans?” 
Palmer wrote while sharing the hateful post. 
On April 30, the self-described human rights advocate shared a Facebook post from the Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge, a Black supremacist sect affiliated with the Black Hebrew Israelite movement. 
The Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge has been designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center for racist, antisemitic and misogynistic views, which claim that Jews have “stolen their identity and ‘birthright.'” 
In the video, a man wearing a loud T-shirt reading “Real Jews, not the fake ones” delivers an unhinged race-based interpretation of the Book of Genesis. 
In other posts, Palmer  who also advises on jail sentences for the San Francisco District Attorney’s Sentencing Commission  suggested on Instagram that Kamala Harris would try to increase the incomes of Jewish people if elected president and promoted a conspiracy theory about “Zio Bolsheviks.” 
“These posts are unambiguously antisemitic and the fact that he has shared so many of them reveals a clear pattern of agreement with the content,” said Jeremy Russell, spokesperson for the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Bay Area. 
Palmer has been accused by four women of abuse and claimed homelessness to get out of 97 parking tickets with fines of $9,743, the San Francisco Chronicle reported. 
Some members of the Board of Supervisors, which appointed Palmer to the Sheriff’s Oversight Board as part of a criminal justice reform push, have called on Palmer to resign after allegations of violence against women emerged. 
“On top of the other allegations, this shows a person unfit to serve in any role on the Oversight Board, let alone as president. 
We join the others in the community urging his removal,” Russell added. 
“Mr. 
Palmer’s expressed views and alleged criminal conduct do not represent the views of the District Attorney’s Office or the Sentencing Commission,” the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office said in a statement. 
“The views he has expressed are troubling and the alleged conduct is completely incompatible with expectations for Sentencing Commission members,” the office said. 
Palmer’s extreme social media takes didn’t stop with women. 
Referring to himself as a “card carrying masculine alpha man,” he claimed in April 2023 that “nature selected men to have multiple wives,” blasted interracial marriage and attacked feminism. 
“In the beginning the Creator created a Helpmate, not a feminist that neglects the family to be a Boss Chic, doing Slut Walks with an Only Fans with pronouns,” he shared on Facebook in August 2025. 
In a phone call, Palmer denied he is antisemitic and claimed he is dating a Jewish woman he was “supposed to meet up with tonight.” 
“I’m a person who seeks knowledge,” he claimed. 
Asked about sharing antisemitic conspiracy theories, he called himself an “avid researcher of history.” 
“I know for a fact based upon my research and going to different places  that the people in the Bible, the children of Israel, they were not from Eastern European counties,” Palmer alleged. 
Palmer was appointed to the Sheriff’s Oversight Board in 2021 as part of a push to include people with “lived experience” to shape the jail system. 
He was praised in the media for supposedly turning his life around, using his experience to advocate for inmates through his nonprofit, “Life After Next.” 
Palmer, 55, had served 31 years of a life sentence in prison for a crime he committed as a teenager. 
The California Supreme Court had ruled his sentencing as “excessive punishment,” but his run-ins with the criminal justice system didn’t end with his release in 2019. 
Officers have pulled over Palmer at least three times in recent months for traffic violations. 
In one body camera video, Palmer complained about being arrested for refusing to give his driver’s license, according to the Chronicle. 
“I’m the president of the Sheriff’s Department Oversight Board… You really think this is going to be swept under the rug?” 
Palmer was recorded saying. 
Past supervisors had already called on him to resign after the allegations surfaced, but he refused and even presided on the board from within the jail. 
On his parking tickets, Palmer said low-income people should not have to pay to park outside their apartment. 
“I deserve the right to own a car, and I believe that what they are doing is unfair,” Palmer told The Chronicle. 
“I’m just the person who has the guts to say, ‘No, I’m not doing that.’ 
If your city budget is dependent on tickets and impound, there’s a problem.” 
The city ended up forgiving most of his tickets after he applied for a waiver. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.2%Annie Gaus: 6.8%California Post: 4.0%Confirmation Bias19.2%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 2.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Annie Gaus: 5.6%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic8.5%This article: 2.7%Annie Gaus: 1.8%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.7%This article: 2.7%Annie Gaus: 0.4%California Post: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.7%This article: 3.5%Annie Gaus: 1.9%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias3.5%This article: 9.0%Annie Gaus: 12.3%California Post: 10.4%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%Annie Gaus: 0.6%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.7%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Annie Gaus: 2.5%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias2.4%This article: 53.8%Annie Gaus: 23.7%California Post: 16.1%Negativity Bias53.8%This article: 6.1%Annie Gaus: 5.1%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias6.1%This article: 2.6%Annie Gaus: 1.7%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error2.6%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.9%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Annie Gaus: 1.9%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 1.5%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Annie Gaus: 1.6%California Post: 3.0%Halo Effect6.2%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.6%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Annie Gaus: 1.3%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 8.7%Annie Gaus: 0.7%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect8.7%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Annie Gaus: 4.6%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem5.7%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.4%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.6%Annie Gaus: 2.6%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority7.6%This article: 1.3%Annie Gaus: 0.8%California Post: 1.4%False Dilemma1.3%This article: 1.3%Annie Gaus: 5.1%California Post: 1.0%Slippery Slope1.3%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.3%Annie Gaus: 8.5%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization19.3%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 1.7%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.2%Annie Gaus: 0.3%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon1.2%This article: 17.9%Annie Gaus: 7.9%California Post: 9.0%Appeal to Emotion17.9%This article: 4.6%Annie Gaus: 1.5%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question4.6%This article: 4.2%Annie Gaus: 2.8%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.2%This article: 3.2%Annie Gaus: 0.7%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque3.2%This article: 8.0%Annie Gaus: 0.7%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof8.0%This article: 0.8%Annie Gaus: 0.6%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.8%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.1%Annie Gaus: 4.2%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal6.1%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.3%Annie Gaus: 3.1%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.3%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.3%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.3%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 3.2%Annie Gaus: 1.4%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy3.2%This article: 30.8%Annie Gaus: 4.6%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote30.8%This article: 4.2%Annie Gaus: 1.9%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection4.2%This article: 23.9%Annie Gaus: 17.9%California Post: 13.2%Biased Writer Voice23.9%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.8%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.6%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 2.0%California Post: 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Annie Gaus: 0.8%California Post: 6.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

968 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers30%attributed speech675writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageJeremy Russell • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageJeremy Russell • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageSan Francisco District Attorney’s Office • 31 words • 100.0% coverageSan Francisco District Attorney’s Office • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWilliam Monroe Palmer • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Monroe Palmer • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWilliam Monroe Palmer • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Monroe Palmer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Monroe Palmer • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWilliam Monroe Palmer • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Monroe Palmer • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Monroe Palmer • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Monroe Palmer • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
54 attributed words18% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Biased Writer Voice+27.8 ptsWriter: 29.6%San Francisco District Attorney’s Office: 57.4%57.4%Unattributed Quote-32.3 ptsWriter: 32.3%San Francisco District Attorney’s Office: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%San Francisco District Attorney’s Office: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.