Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antisemitic Conspiracy Theories results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 1,138 hits. Analysis detected 5,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,652 of 15,772 topics). This Antisemitic Conspiracy Theories is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Antisemitic Conspiracy Theories
Topic details
Total words: 3,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.4%29.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.7%13.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos