Speaker summary
71%3 analyzed articles/videos98.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neera Tanden results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 79% saturation with 109.853 hits. Analysis detected 517.913 faulty-reasoning hits from 98.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 34% and a BS Rank of 53% (13,445 of 28,364 speakers). This Neera Tanden is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Neera Tanden
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 98.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
34.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos98.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 79.0%79.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 64.2%64.2%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 42.6%42.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.3%30.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 79.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 64.2%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate