Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (12,179 of 37,988 speakers). This Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠68%Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) (selected)50%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos