Speaker summary
34%10 analyzed articles/videos248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Highway Traffic Safety Administration results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 269 hits. Analysis detected 673 faulty-reasoning hits from 248 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (24,954 of 28,364 speakers). This National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.0% percentile
10.3% BS Score10 analyzed videos248 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.0%17.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate