How to keep babies safe when temperatures soar 18%

By Associated Press60%

7/20/2026, 3:28:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 512 faulty-reasoning hits from 587 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (16,897 of 20,498 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the article peer group.

By The Associated Press 
Infants, toddlers and young children need outdoor activity to build strong bodies and minds, but they also require extra care in the heat. 
In the summer months, those twin imperatives can make parents anxious. 
How long should kids be out? 
How do I know they’re OK? 
What should I avoid? 
Human-caused climate change is making heat waves longer, stronger and more widespread. 
Much of the U.S. sweltered last week under a heat dome. 
That shift makes questions about keeping babies safe more pressing, said Dr. 
Katherine Williamson, a pediatrician with Rady Children’s Health in Orange, California. 
“We talk about drowning and choking with toddlers, and now we’re starting to add in heat,” she said. 
“It’s become something that’s more commonplace as a potential injury.” 
Here is why children are more vulnerable to heat-related illnesses, and some do’s and don’ts to keep them safe: 
Regulating body temperature is a challenge 
Children sweat less than adults and have a higher metabolism that makes them hot faster. 
In extreme heat, their higher surface area-to-mass ratio increases heat absorption. 
Kids also tend to spend more time outdoors. 
On hot days, parents need to be vigilant about the signs of heat illness. 
A lack of tears or regular wet diapers could indicate your baby is dehydrated. 
Parents should feed infants in smaller quantities more frequently to make sure they are getting enough fluid. 
Though not necessarily signs of illness, fatigue and flushed skin likely mean your child needs a break to cool off. 
Williamson said increased irritability could also indicate your child is too hot. 
Tips for keeping them safe 
Avoid going out during the hottest parts of the day, dress kids in loose, light-colored clothing, apply sunscreen and make sure they are getting enough fluids. 
Water-rich fruits such as watermelon and strawberries are great snacks in the heat. 
“If you’re hot, your baby sure is going to be hot,” said Dr. 
Debra Langlois, a pediatrician at the University of Michigan Health C.S. 
Mott Children’s Hospital. 
Langlois said parents and other caregivers should limit the amount of time infants and toddlers are outside in hot weather, but she doesn’t advise remaining strictly indoors at any point. 
Don’t put blankets or other covers on a stroller 
That advice seems counterintuitive. 
After all, doesn’t it make sense to shield children from the sun? 
But blankets and other coverings, even thin ones, prevent air from circulating and trap heat that can raise the temperature in the stroller. 
Instead, use a canopy for shade. 
Williamson also advises parents to check metal parts that can heat up and burn children. 
Don’t leave kids in the car 
Even in the shade and with open windows, car temperatures can rise dramatically in a short amount of time. 
In 2025, 31 children died of heat stroke in vehicles, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 
The agency recommends caregivers leave a purse or other personal item in the back seat, write a note or place a stuffed animal on the passenger seat to ensure they don’t forget a child inside. 
If you return to a parked car with your baby on a hot day, ensure the metal parts of the car seat are also not too hot. 
For extra comfort, use a sun shade to keep the interior cooler and turn on the air conditioning in advance. 
To cool a hot car, experts recommend opening the windows for 10 to 20 seconds while running the air conditioning. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Orlando Sentinel: 3.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Associated Press: 3.1%Orlando Sentinel: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 1.4%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Associated Press: 1.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias9.0%This article: 4.6%Associated Press: 7.3%Orlando Sentinel: 3.6%Framing Effect4.6%This article: 3.1%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Loss Aversion3.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%Orlando Sentinel: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Associated Press: 1.4%Orlando Sentinel: 1.3%Pessimism Bias1.9%This article: 5.6%Associated Press: 8.8%Orlando Sentinel: 8.6%Negativity Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.1%Orlando Sentinel: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Associated Press: 2.5%Orlando Sentinel: 6.3%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Associated Press: 1.5%Orlando Sentinel: 0.8%Recency Bias5.1%This article: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.3%Orlando Sentinel: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.1%Associated Press: 3.5%Orlando Sentinel: 2.6%Appeal to Authority6.1%This article: 6.1%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 1.2%False Dilemma6.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.7%Associated Press: 2.7%Orlando Sentinel: 3.7%Hasty Generalization1.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 4.6%Orlando Sentinel: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.0%Associated Press: 2.3%Orlando Sentinel: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Orlando Sentinel: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Orlando Sentinel: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.1%Associated Press: 1.3%Orlando Sentinel: 1.0%Unattributed Quote3.1%This article: 2.2%Associated Press: 1.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 5.8%Associated Press: 3.0%Orlando Sentinel: 7.3%Biased Writer Voice5.8%This article: 16.9%Associated Press: 0.7%Orlando Sentinel: 2.6%Indoctrination16.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Orlando Sentinel: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.6%

587 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers19%attributed speech475writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageThe Associated Press • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKatherine Williamson • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKatherine Williamson • 18 words • 100.0% coverageKatherine Williamson • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKatherine Williamson • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageDebra Langlois • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDebra Langlois • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageKatherine Williamson • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration • 19 words • 0.0% coverageNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words33% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination-20.8 ptsWriter: 20.8%National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.