Speaker summary
73%1 analyzed article/video327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Pope results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Availability Heuristic, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 610.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 327 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,785 of 28,364 speakers). This Nathan Pope is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Nathan Pope
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 327
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510012.6% percentile
10.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos327 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.4%12.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos