Author summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 1,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kat Tenbarge results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 443 hits . Analysis detected 2,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,063 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,012 of 6,628 authors). This Kat Tenbarge is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Kat Tenbarge
Author details
Total words: 3,063
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.7% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.5% 14.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst