Speaker summary
65% 5 analyzed articles/videos 263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Berman results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 44.9% saturation with 127.005 hits . Analysis detected 717.926 faulty-reasoning hits from 263 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (24,267 of 28,364 speakers). This Nathan Berman is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Nathan Berman
Speaker details
Total words: 263
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.4% percentile 11.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos263 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 44.9% 44.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 23.5% 23.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 19.3% 19.3% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 44.9%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 26.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% No True Scotsman: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst