Author summary
8%2 analyzed articles/videos676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These PHILIP MARCELO Associated Press results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 1,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,012 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,969 of 6,387 authors). This PHILIP MARCELO Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
PHILIP MARCELO Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
7%PHILIP MARCELO Associated Press (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,012
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate