Speaker summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nate Adams results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.9% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 952.833 faulty-reasoning hits from 166 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (16,835 of 26,855 speakers). This Nate Adams is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Nate Adams
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 166
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510037.3% percentile
23.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos166 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 72.3%72.3%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 35.6%35.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 48.9%48.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 72.3%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.9%, sitewide 19.2%Tu Quoque: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Special Pleading: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos