Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy LeaMond results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 90.916 hits. Analysis detected 531.187 faulty-reasoning hits from 255 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,940 of 28,364 speakers). This Nancy LeaMond is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Nancy LeaMond
Speaker details
Total words: 255
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.7% percentile
18.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos255 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 25.3%25.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 35.6%35.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.8%18.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos