Speaker summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos67 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Landry results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Recency Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 151 faulty-reasoning hits from 67 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,653 of 28,364 speakers). This Nancy Landry is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Nancy Landry
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 67
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
19.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos67 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 26.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos