Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miles Parks results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 2,712 hits. Analysis detected 20,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,196 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,693 of 6,244 authors). This Miles Parks is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Miles Parks
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
41%Miles Parks (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,196
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.1%14.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.0%7.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate