Author summary
52%1 analyzed article/video1,844 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melissa Quinn results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 683 hits. Analysis detected 4,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,489 of 6,358 authors). This Melissa Quinn is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Melissa Quinn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
46%Melissa Quinn (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,532
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.3%12.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos