Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Murphy-Anderson results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 53.9% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 469 faulty-reasoning hits from 115 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,165 of 28,364 speakers). This Murphy-Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Murphy-Anderson
Speaker details
Total words: 115
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
51.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos115 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 53.9%53.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 53.9%53.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 53.9%53.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 53.9%53.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 46.1%46.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 46.1%46.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.1%46.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 53.9%53.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Begging the Question: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 46.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 46.1%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos