Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video3,176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morgan Sung results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 515.888 hits. Analysis detected 3,544.044 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,186 of 28,364 speakers). This Morgan Sung is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Morgan Sung
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos