Author summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 5,871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morgan Sung results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,980 hits . Analysis detected 14,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,512 of 6,416 authors). This Morgan Sung is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Morgan Sung
Author details
Total words: 23,484
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles23.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst