Author summary
32% 2 analyzed articles/videos 8,472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana De Almeida Amaral results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 2,102 hits . Analysis detected 19,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,888 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (5,980 of 6,364 authors). This Ana De Almeida Amaral is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Ana De Almeida Amaral
Author details
Total words: 33,888
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles33.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst