Speaker summary
73% 3 analyzed articles/videos 628.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mona Yacoubian results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 184 hits . Analysis detected 1,170.199 faulty-reasoning hits from 628.333 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,099 of 28,364 speakers). This Mona Yacoubian is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group. Mona Yacoubian
Speaker details
Total words: 628.333
Content count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.0% percentile 8.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos628.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 28.1% 28.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.0% Composition/Division: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst