Speaker summary
⁠56%3 analyzed articles/videos92 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mona Charen results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.7% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 171 faulty-reasoning hits from 92 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 31% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,516 of 28,364 speakers). This Mona Charen is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Mona Charen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 92
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.8% percentile
31.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos92 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 45.6%45.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.5%31.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos