Speaker summary
⁠28%2 analyzed articles/videos181.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature, Quote-first Misdirection, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 168.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 181.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,731 of 28,364 speakers). This Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group.
Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos181.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos