Speaker summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos101.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad Akbarzadeh results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Circular Reasoning, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 80.9% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 456 faulty-reasoning hits from 101.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 36.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,743 of 28,364 speakers). This Mohammad Akbarzadeh is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Mohammad Akbarzadeh
Speaker details
Total words: 101.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
36.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos101.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 80.8%80.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.7%23.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 80.8%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos