Speaker summary
74% 6 analyzed articles/videos 108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mission Local results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Quote-first Misdirection , and Appeal to Authority , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 43 hits . Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 18% and a BS Rank of 29% (19,782 of 27,556 speakers). This Mission Local is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Mission Local
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.2% percentile 18.0% BS Score6 analyzed videos108 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 39.8% 39.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 26.9% 26.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 26.9% 26.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 9.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst