Speaker summary
⁠53%4 analyzed articles/videos440.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Milli Atkinson results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 1,291.017 faulty-reasoning hits from 440.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,252 of 28,364 speakers). This Milli Atkinson is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Milli Atkinson
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.4% percentile
8.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos440.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 16.1%16.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.1%15.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos