Speaker summary
⁠70%5 analyzed articles/videos175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Rogers results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 388.025 faulty-reasoning hits from 175 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,535 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Rogers is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Mike Rogers
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠17%Mike Rogers (selected)13%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.0% percentile
12.5% BS Score5 analyzed videos175 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate