Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Marshall results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 249.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,409 of 26,489 speakers). This Mike Marshall is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Mike Marshall
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos