Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video217.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Friend results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, In-Group Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46% saturation with 100.125 hits. Analysis detected 419.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 217.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,753 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Friend is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Mike Friend
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 217.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510037.4% percentile
23.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos217.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 44.8%44.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 44.8%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos