Speaker summary
83%1 analyzed article/video70.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Chitwood results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 84% saturation with 59.25 hits. Analysis detected 167.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (12,882 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Chitwood is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Mike Chitwood
Speaker details
Total words: 70.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
36.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 84.0%84.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 67.5%67.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 84.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 67.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 1.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos