Speaker summary
⁠57%3 analyzed articles/videos184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mikal Bridges results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 64.136 hits. Analysis detected 214.513 faulty-reasoning hits from 184 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,375 of 28,364 speakers). This Mikal Bridges is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Mikal Bridges
Speaker details
Total words: 184
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510017.6% percentile
12.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos184 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 30.8%30.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos