Speaker summary
72%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miguel de la O results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 62.3% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 38 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.3% and a BS Rank of 76% (6,837 of 28,364 speakers). This Miguel de la O is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Miguel de la O
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.9% percentile
62.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 62.3%62.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos