Judge Accepts Mother’s Claim COVID Made Her Kill Her Infant Daughter 21%

By Spencer Lombardo0%

6/25/2026, 8:17:07 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 326 faulty-reasoning hits from 301 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (16,869 of 21,171 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the article peer group.

A Miami woman was acquitted after claiming COVID-19 caused her to drown her infant and stab her husband and other daughter. 
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Miguel de la O acquitted Precious Bland on reason of insanity last Tuesday, NBC6 reported Wednesday. 
Her attorney said during the bench trial that a psychotic episode triggered by COVID-19 was responsible for the fatal incident that occurred at her home on Aug. 
23, 2021. 
“Jesus Christ is coming and COVID is going to kill us all,” she began telling family members the night of the incident before insisting to baptize them, according to a police report, NBC6 reported. 
Bland held her 15-month-old daughter underwater in the bathtub soon after, per the report. 
She reportedly stabbed her husband multiple times when he tried to intervene. 
She also reportedly stabbed her 16-year-old daughter in the forearm before she, her three siblings, and father escaped the house. 
The Miami-Dade Circuit Court did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment. 
WATCH: 
Bland’s husband and teenage daughter were treated for their wounds, NBC6 reported in 2021. 
Bland was treated for apparent self-inflicted stab wounds on her wrists. 
Her toddler was pronounced dead after authorities found her unresponsive in the bathtub. 
Charges against Bland included second-degree murder, attempted second degree murder, and aggravated child abuse. 
She opted for a bench trial, waving her right to a jury. 
The judge ruled that Bland didn’t understand the nature or consequences of her actions that night, according to NBC6. 
Bland’s defense attorney told the outlet that he believes this is America’s first successful COVID-related insanity defense. 
The judge let Bland stay home as she awaits a hearing that’ll determine if she needs more mental health treatment, according to NBC6. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.0%Spencer Lombardo: 4.5%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Confirmation Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Spencer Lombardo: 2.8%The Daily Caller: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias5.6%This article: 7.0%Spencer Lombardo: 7.1%The Daily Caller: 10.4%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 2.8%The Daily Caller: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%Spencer Lombardo: 5.6%The Daily Caller: 8.2%Negativity Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.6%Spencer Lombardo: 3.2%The Daily Caller: 4.6%Appeal to Authority12.6%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%Spencer Lombardo: 4.2%The Daily Caller: 6.3%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 3.7%The Daily Caller: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.9%Spencer Lombardo: 12.9%The Daily Caller: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.9%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.7%Spencer Lombardo: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Burden of Proof4.7%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.7%Spencer Lombardo: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 1.5%Anecdotal4.7%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.0%Spencer Lombardo: 2.2%The Daily Caller: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.3%Spencer Lombardo: 2.8%The Daily Caller: 2.2%Unattributed Quote11.3%This article: 11.3%Spencer Lombardo: 8.5%The Daily Caller: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection11.3%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 2.7%The Daily Caller: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 3.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Spencer Lombardo: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.3%Spencer Lombardo: 0.1%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.3%

301 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers35%attributed speech197writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMiguel de la O • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDaily Caller News Foundation • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageNBC6 • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coveragePrecious Bland • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMiguel de la O • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMiguel de la O • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Miguel de la O

62%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words59% of attributed speech65% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-17.3 ptsWriter: 17.3%Miguel de la O: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-17.3 ptsWriter: 17.3%Miguel de la O: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.5 ptsWriter: 0.5%Miguel de la O: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.