Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Whatley results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,775 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Whatley is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Michael Whatley
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510090.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos