Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video2,804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Damianos results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 1,008.061 hits. Analysis detected 4,885.329 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,653 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Damianos is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Michael Damianos
Speaker details
Total words: 2,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.5% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos