Speaker summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Brophy results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Unattributed Quote , and Anecdotal , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 76 hits . Analysis detected 389 faulty-reasoning hits from 164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.5% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,034 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Brophy is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Michael Brophy
Speaker details
Total words: 164
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 20.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos164 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 33.3% 33.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 31.9% 31.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 29.8% 29.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst