Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miatta Fahnbulleh results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Nature, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 72% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 166.72 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 52.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,928 of 28,364 speakers). This Miatta Fahnbulleh is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Miatta Fahnbulleh
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
52.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 72.0%72.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 64.0%64.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 25.3%25.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 72.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 64.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos