Speaker summary
⁠25%3 analyzed articles/videos101.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Merrick Garland results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 101.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,519 of 28,364 speakers). This Merrick Garland is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Merrick Garland
Speaker details
Total words: 101.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510024.1% percentile
15.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos101.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos