Speaker summary
56% 5 analyzed articles/videos 369.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melinda French Gates results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Anecdotal , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 104.215 hits . Analysis detected 806.808 faulty-reasoning hits from 369.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,750 of 28,364 speakers). This Melinda French Gates is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Melinda French Gates
Speaker details
Total words: 369.333
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 7.1% BS Score5 analyzed videos369.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 18.3% 18.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 22.0% 22.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst