Speaker summary
55% 10 analyzed articles/videos 961.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Green results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 175.341 hits . Analysis detected 1,645.474 faulty-reasoning hits from 961.333 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,643 of 28,364 speakers). This Megan Green is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Megan Green
Speaker details
Total words: 961.333
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 5.0% BS Score10 analyzed videos961.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst