Speaker summary
75% 4 analyzed articles/videos 176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Media Research Center results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 84.3% saturation with 263 hits . Analysis detected 1,245.061 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.9% and a BS Rank of 42% (16,454 of 28,364 speakers). This Media Research Center is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Media Research Center
Speaker details
Total words: 176
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.0% percentile 25.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos176 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 84.3% 84.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 47.0% 47.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 49.7% 49.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 37.0% 37.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 28.1% 28.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 34.7% 34.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 25.0% 25.0% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 24.4% 24.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Negativity Bias: Speaker 84.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 49.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 47.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 26.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 9.1% Straw Man: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Red Herring: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst