Speaker summary
⁠79%5 analyzed articles/videos662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayor Daniel Lurie results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 734 faulty-reasoning hits from 662 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,817 of 28,364 speakers). This Mayor Daniel Lurie is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Mayor Daniel Lurie

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.5% percentile
6.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos662 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.4%2.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.4%22.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos