Speaker summary
66% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Whitaker results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Anchoring Bias , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 240.462 hits . Analysis detected 2,166.942 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,276 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,566 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Whitaker is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Matt Whitaker
Speaker details
Total words: 1,276
Content count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.7% 17.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.5% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.1% Horn Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst