Speaker summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos182.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Rauschenbach results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 50.4% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 474.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 182.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,435 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Rauschenbach is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Matt Rauschenbach
Speaker details
Total words: 182.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.5% percentile
23.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos182.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.4%50.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 27.7%27.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos