Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video118.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Hall results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 68.1% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 411.774 faulty-reasoning hits from 118.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,899 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Hall is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Matt Hall
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 118.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
39.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos118.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 68.1%68.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 45.4%45.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 61.4%61.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.7%22.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 68.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 61.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos