Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video66.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Brooks results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Genetic Fallacy, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 67.2% saturation with 44.669 hits. Analysis detected 235.669 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,862 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Brooks is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Matt Brooks
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 66.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
36.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 67.2%67.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.3%34.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 67.2%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos