Speaker summary
⁠48%3 analyzed articles/videos76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Bradford results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 209 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,762 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Bradford is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Matt Bradford
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
25.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Begging the Question: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 19.2%Red Herring: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos