Here’s what’s in  and not in  Pennsylvania’s $50.8 billion state budget 26%

By Gillian McGoldrick28% Ethan Young29%

7/13/2026, 10:30:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 250 hits. Analysis detected 2,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,651 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.8% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,291 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the article peer group.

HARRISBURG  Pennsylvania’s new $50.8 billion state budget was sprawled across more than 600 pages of legislation and signed into law on Sunday. 
New data center regulations, new education funding, and more were approved in the wide-ranging spending package. 
But some of the most pressing issues facing the General Assembly were noticeably absent from the final deal, as Gov. 
Josh Shapiro and lawmakers in the split legislature were unable to reach a compromise  or didn’t want to touch the contentious issues until after they are up for election in November, sidelining some of Shapiro’s top budget priorities. 
Here’s a look at what’s in  and what was left out  of the 2026-27 Pennsylvania state budget. 
» READ MORE: Pa. lawmakers and Gov. 
Josh Shapiro have approved a $50.8 billion state budget, delaying action on key issues 
In: Education funding increases 
Pennsylvania took another jump toward filling a multibillion-dollar funding gap between wealthy and poor school districts, after a court found that the state’s old system of funding education was unconstitutional. 
Since 2024, when the state first implemented new adequacy and tax equity formulas in efforts to fill the state’s $4.5 billion “adequacy gap,” lawmakers have put nearly $1.9 billion toward funding lower-income districts, with plans to fill it by 2032. 
“It keeps our promise to our school districts,” said State Rep. 
Jordan Harris (D., Philadelphia), who serves on the powerful appropriations committee responsible for allocating state dollars, in remarks on the House floor Sunday. 
The latest installment of adequacy and tax equity payments  $565 million  will largely go to low-income districts that already have high property taxes. 
The School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania’s largest school district and the only one in the state that is unable to raise its own revenue, will get $136 million of that funding increase. 
Out: Revenue generators 
Shapiro proposed generating new revenue streams to help the state fix its multibillion-dollar structural deficit in his last four budget addresses. 
But the ways he wants to raise that cash have been met with resistance by Senate Republicans, who argue they aren’t policies that will improve the state’s economic standing  or can’t reach agreement within their caucus on how to address the issues. 
Shapiro this year didn’t get the hefty minimum wage increase he asked for, raising the hourly minimum from $7.25 to $15  and counting on the higher wage for $80 million in higher income tax revenues. 
Nor was he able to get the split General Assembly, where Democrats control the House and Republicans lead the Senate, to approve adult-use cannabis, which his office estimated would bring in $729.4 million in its first year, largely through licensing. 
(House Democrats have approved plans for a minimum wage increase and recreational marijuana legalization, but the Senate has not voted on the bills.) 
» READ MORE: Could recreational marijuana really bring $1.3 billion in revenue to Pa. over five years? 
Here’s how other states are faring. 
Shapiro, in his February budget proposal, also called on the General Assembly to regulate and tax skill games at the same rate as casinos, a move which he has estimated could generate nearly $800 million in revenue in its first year. 
But any regulation of skill games  slot-machine lookalikes that the state Supreme Court ruled last month are a form of gambling  was left out of the budget. 
Lawmakers still have until October to decide whether skill games will be taxed and regulated, part of a grace period in the high court’s ruling. 
Otherwise, they will become illegal gambling machines found in many corner stores, gas stations, and bars. 
The issue has been the target of more than $8 million in lobbying and $9 million in campaign spending in Harrisburg, mostly funded by one company. 
» READ MORE: How ‘skill games’ exploded across Pennsylvania  and sparked a multimillion-dollar political fight 
“We can act within the 120 days, we can act after the 120 days,” Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R., Indiana) said on Sunday. 
“But the choice is now quite simple. 
These machines are illegal, and in less than 120 days, they will be leaving the marketplace.” 
In: Data center reporting requirements 
Data centers  which are seeing a boom in Pennsylvania as artificial intelligence usage increases and communities are pushing back on where they are being built  will be required to submit information about their energy and water usage. 
Beginning next summer, data centers in the state with a peak energy demand greater than 10 megawatts will be required to submit information annually to the Department of Environmental Protection. 
Outlined as part of this year’s fiscal code, those reports will be publicly-accessible. 
Data centers that do not submit information about their resource usage will be fined $10,000 a day. 
In: Compromise 
“Compromise” was the word of the day around the Pennsylvania Capitol on Sunday, when the legislature swiftly passed the more than 600-page budget deal hashed out behind closed doors between Shapiro, Pittman, and House Majority Leader Matt Bradford (D., Montgomery) and passed with bipartisan support in both chambers. 
The legislative leaders and Shapiro emphasized that they didn’t get exactly what they wanted in the budget, as a symptom of dealing with divided government. 
And leaders were proud to have reached the deal less than two weeks after their July 1 deadline, rather than the nearly five months that it took to hash out an agreement last year. 
Lawmakers also agreed to work over the weekend to hurriedly approve the budget deal, with members of the Senate coming in on Saturday night to begin advancing parts of the budget deal and the House joining them Sunday afternoon. 
By 6:15 p.m. on Sunday, Shapiro had signed it. 
Among the inspirations for the weekend of productivity: Making it to the MLB All-Star Game in Philadelphia, Bradford said, for which he has tickets. 
Out: Typical budget math 
Leaders returned to some old accounting maneuvers to address the state’s multibillion-dollar structural deficit and avoid pulling from the state’s emergency savings account. 
They spent down unused and underused dedicated funds, and rolled some of the state’s Medicaid payments totaling $1.3 billion to the next fiscal year, a move lawmakers typically resorted to before the state saw an influx of federal dollars during the COVID pandemic. 
Without those delayed payments, the state budget would total closer to $52.1 billion, and several GOP members criticized the total as being disingenuous. 
In: Cost-of-living bumps for pensioned workers 
More than 80,000 retired public-sector employees will receive a cost-of-living adjustment to their pensions, something advocates have sought for years. 
» READ MORE: More than 80,000 Pa. retired teachers, police officers, and firefighters will get a pension bump  some for the first time in decades 
Public school teachers and other state employees who retired before July 1, 2002 will receive a tiered monthly payment based on the date of their retirement. 
Similarly, police officers and firefighters who retired more than five years ago will receive monthly payments ranging from $50 to $300 dollars, depending on how long they have been retired. 
Lawmakers from both parties had called for the cost-of-living increase. 
In: Closing Philly’s sales tax loophole 
Legislators also agreed to close a loophole that allowed online sellers to avoid paying Philadelphia’s local 2% sales tax on purchases made in the city. 
Mayor Cherelle L. 
Parker had asked the General Assembly to close it as part of her own city budget pitch in a move estimated to bring an additional $1.5 million to Philadelphia. 
Out: Banning cell phones in schools 
Twenty-nine states have bell-to-bell cell phone bans. 
This year, Pennsylvania will not join them, despite the passage of two separate phone ban bills  one in each chamber of the legislature. 
In: Mandatory recess for students K-5 
Recess is now law in Pennsylvania. 
Another education policy change championed by Shapiro, a mandatory, 30-minute recess for students in grades kindergarten through fifth was established in this year’s budget as a way to improve learning outcomes. 
Out: Addressing looming problems  with looming deadlines 
Several Pennsylvania funding issues that have gone years without being addressed were left out of the latest budget, some with more pressing deadlines than others. 
Lawmakers did not address a need for mass transit funding  which led to last year’s bitter budget stalemate among legislators  but are expected to identify a long-term funding stream for the transit agencies next year when a two-year fail-safe runs out. 
» READ MORE: Public transit is in trouble all across Pennsylvania, including in GOP districts 
Other local governments and service providers said their needs are more urgent. 
The County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania released an urgent plea after the state budget was signed that counties still have not received the critical mental health funding they need, or a surcharge increase used to fund 911 call systems. 
Home-health service providers also continued their calls for increased state funding they say is needed, as the industry faces serious staffing issues due to low state reimbursement rates. 
» READ MORE: Pennsylvania’s home care industry is in crisis, with low pay and unfilled shifts driving it toward collapse 
In: More funding for rape crisis centers 
Rape crisis centers got a much-needed funding increase, doubling how much the centers receive from $12 million to just over $24 million. 
Philadelphia’s only rape crisis center had to lay off its employees and rely on volunteer work during last year’s monthslong state budget impasse. 
Republican and Democratic lawmakers championed the organizations in this budget, making the largest single-year increase for the critical services in state history, according to the Pennsylvania Coalition to Advance Respect. 
“Today marks a turning point for survivors and rape crisis centers across Pennsylvania,” said Joyce Lukima, the organization’s coalition director, in a news release. 
Ethan Young is an intern with the Pennsylvania Legislative Correspondents’ Association. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.5%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Confirmation Bias2.4%This article: 10.6%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias10.6%This article: 4.1%Gillian McGoldrick: 2.0%Inquirer.com: 2.5%Availability Heuristic4.1%This article: 2.7%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.7%This article: 2.6%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias2.6%This article: 0.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.4%This article: 4.8%Gillian McGoldrick: 8.4%Inquirer.com: 5.0%Framing Effect4.8%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.5%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect6.1%This article: 7.8%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 2.7%Optimism Bias7.8%This article: 9.2%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.9%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias9.2%This article: 14.7%Gillian McGoldrick: 7.6%Inquirer.com: 5.7%Negativity Bias14.7%This article: 3.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 3.0%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias3.0%This article: 2.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error2.4%This article: 4.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.2%Inquirer.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Halo Effect8.1%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.3%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.1%Gillian McGoldrick: 2.9%Inquirer.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority15.1%This article: 5.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 2.4%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma5.4%This article: 1.9%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope1.9%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.4%Inquirer.com: 3.3%Hasty Generalization2.4%This article: 1.2%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring1.2%This article: 1.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Bandwagon1.0%This article: 8.7%Gillian McGoldrick: 4.3%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion8.7%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.3%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.3%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.6%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Anecdotal3.6%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.7%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.7%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.9%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading2.9%This article: 1.6%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy1.6%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.7%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.4%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.7%This article: 2.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 2.1%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice2.4%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.1%

1651 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers9.8%attributed speech1,489writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJordan Harris • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Pittman • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Pittman • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Pittman • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCherelle L. Parker • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCounty Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJoyce Lukima • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words24% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.8 ptsWriter: 6.8%County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.7 ptsWriter: 0.7%County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.