Speaker summary
70%1 analyzed article/video75 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Masaaki Kimura results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Burden of Proof, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75.8% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 367.631 faulty-reasoning hits from 75 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (11,341 of 28,364 speakers). This Masaaki Kimura is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Masaaki Kimura
Speaker details
Total words: 75
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
42.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos75 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 75.8%75.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.8%75.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 62.9%62.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 24.2%24.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 75.8%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 62.9%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos