A Scientist Says a Baffling Seafloor Structure Marks Japan’s Atlantis 48%

By Darren Orf35%

7/8/2026, 12:30:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 35.5% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 611 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of 48% (11,443 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the article peer group.

In 1986, while searching for new hammerhead shark viewing points off the coast of Yonaguni Island—the westernmost Japanese island, 70 miles east of Taiwan—diving tour guide Kihachiro Aratake stumbled across an inexplainable underwater formation. 
The rocky seafloor structure consists of rocks shaped at nearly perfect 90-degree angles, resembling terraces leading to an ancient, man-made structure lost in the inhospitable waters of the East China and Philippine seas. 
“When I first found it […] my hair stood on end. 
I had goosebumps all over. 
It was overwhelming,” Aratake told the BBC some 35 years after the discovery. 
“Upon discovering it, I realized that this would become a treasure of Yonaguni Island.” 
As it turned out, these mysterious step-like rocks would become much more than that. 
In the following years, the Yonaguni Monument (as it was eventually called) became the center of a debate around its origin. 
Was this monument the creation of some island society lost to history, or simply a beautiful-yet-natural rock formation? 
One of the first scientists to study the site was Masaaki Kimura, a geologist at the University of the Ryukyus in Okinawa, Japan. 
He suggested that the monument was a kind of step pyramid, possibly constructed several thousand years ago, before the sea level rise that followed the last Ice Age eventually submerged it. 
Some others even suggested that the monument is a remnant of the lost city of Mu—a mythical place believed to have existed in the Pacific before disappearing beneath the waves in a story similar to the tale of Atlantis. 
“I think it’s very difficult to explain away their origin as being purely natural, because of the vast amount of evidence of man’s influence on the structures,” Kimura told National Geographic in 2007. 
Finding such a manmade monument, measuring 50 meters long and around 20 meters wide, would rewrite the history of the Ryukyu Island chain. 
But not all scientists are convinced. 
One of the skeptics is Robert Schoch, a professor of natural sciences at Boston University, who’s been the most vocal proponent of the idea that the Yonaguni Monument is natural—or at the very least, mostly natural. 
“It is indeed an absolutely incredible structure, and well worth seeing, but I must conclude that, based on all of the evidence, it is primarily a natural structure,” Schoch wrote in a blog on his personal website. 
Schoch has appeared in several articles—and even documentaries—to explain his findings. 
“Parts may have been ‘touched up’ by ancient humans and the ancient inhabitants of the island may have both admired and utilized the Yonaguni Monument. 
We can consider the famous prehistoric cave paintings of Europe. 
The caves themselves are natural […] [but] paintings on their walls and ceilings are artificial productions by early humans.” 
Schoch observed that the structure is made from sandstone and mudstone, which both erodes in flat planes across the surface and fractures horizontally, forming what appear to be human-made terraces. 
Takayuki Ogata, a geologist at Ryukyu University, backs up these claims, saying that the underwater formations resemble those still visible on the surface. 
“I was impressed by the formations underwater, which are continuous from the land above the water’s surface” Ogata told the BBC. 
“I’ve researched several sites and have done a lot of fieldwork, but this was the first time I’d seen formations that were continuous from land to underwater.” 
Today, neither Japan’s Agency for Cultural Affairs nor the government of Okinawa Prefecture consider the area of cultural significance. 
But whether a natural phenomenon or a man-made wonder, the Yonaguni monument—just as Aratake predicted 40 years ago—remains a treasure for the small Japanese island. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.4%Darren Orf: 4.6%Popular Mechanics: 4.4%Confirmation Bias14.4%This article: 5.1%Darren Orf: 1.7%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Anchoring Bias5.1%This article: 14.2%Darren Orf: 4.3%Popular Mechanics: 3.1%Availability Heuristic14.2%This article: 17.3%Darren Orf: 1.9%Popular Mechanics: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic17.3%This article: 8.7%Darren Orf: 2.7%Popular Mechanics: 1.8%Hindsight Bias8.7%This article: 6.1%Darren Orf: 2.7%Popular Mechanics: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 8.7%Darren Orf: 4.0%Popular Mechanics: 3.6%Framing Effect8.7%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.1%Darren Orf: 0.9%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Darren Orf: 3.5%Popular Mechanics: 3.3%Optimism Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 1.1%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Darren Orf: 6.2%Popular Mechanics: 5.3%Negativity Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.4%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Darren Orf: 2.1%Popular Mechanics: 1.9%Halo Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 1.2%Popular Mechanics: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Darren Orf: 0.7%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Primacy Effect8.2%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 35.5%Darren Orf: 7.7%Popular Mechanics: 5.5%Appeal to Authority35.5%This article: 2.9%Darren Orf: 1.1%Popular Mechanics: 1.6%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 3.8%Darren Orf: 0.5%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Slippery Slope3.8%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 4.5%Popular Mechanics: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.3%Darren Orf: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.3%Bandwagon2.3%This article: 20.3%Darren Orf: 3.7%Popular Mechanics: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion20.3%This article: 5.4%Darren Orf: 0.5%Popular Mechanics: 0.8%Begging the Question5.4%This article: 5.1%Darren Orf: 3.7%Popular Mechanics: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.1%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 9.2%Darren Orf: 0.6%Popular Mechanics: 0.6%Burden of Proof9.2%This article: 10.3%Darren Orf: 0.8%Popular Mechanics: 0.5%Appeal to Nature10.3%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.4%Popular Mechanics: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.5%Darren Orf: 3.3%Popular Mechanics: 2.6%Anecdotal9.5%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.5%Darren Orf: 2.3%Popular Mechanics: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.5%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Darren Orf: 0.2%Popular Mechanics: 0.2%Middle Ground1.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 6.4%Darren Orf: 0.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy6.4%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 2.4%Popular Mechanics: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.6%Darren Orf: 1.1%Popular Mechanics: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.6%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 8.0%Popular Mechanics: 5.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 1.6%Popular Mechanics: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.3%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.0%Popular Mechanics: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Darren Orf: 0.4%Popular Mechanics: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

611 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers52%attributed speech293writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageKihachiro Aratake • 11 words • 100.0% coverageKihachiro Aratake • 5 words • 100.0% coverageKihachiro Aratake • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKihachiro Aratake • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMasaaki Kimura • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageMasaaki Kimura • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Schoch • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Schoch • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Schoch • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Schoch • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Schoch • 30 words • 0.0% coverageTakayuki Ogata • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTakayuki Ogata • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTakayuki Ogata • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJapan’s Agency for Cultural Affairs • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Masaaki Kimura

100%flagged-word coverage
64 attributed words20% of attributed speech93% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.